PDF

Nanotheranostics 2023; 7(2):128-141. doi:10.7150/ntno.80120 This issue Cite

Review

Interventional nanotheranostics in hepatocellular carcinoma

Vivek P. Chavda¹ , Pankti C. Balar², Srushti B. Patel³

1. Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, L.M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad, India.
2. Pharmacy Section, L.M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad, India.
3. Pharmacy Section, Government Pharmacy College, Gandhinagar, India.

✉ Corresponding author: Vivek P. Chavda, Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, L.M. College of Pharmacy, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)-380009. Phone: +91 7030919407; E-mail: vivek7chavdacom; ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7701-8597. More

Abstract

Interventional nanotheranostics is a system of drug delivery that does a dual function; along with the therapeutic action, it also does have diagnostic features. This method helps in early detection, targeted delivery, and the least chances of damage to surrounding tissue. It ensures the highest efficiency for the management of the disease. Imaging is the near future for the quickest and most accurate detection of disease. After combing both effective measures, it ensures the most meticulous drug delivery system. Nanoparticles such as Gold NPs, Carbon NPs, Silicon NPS, etc. The article emphasizes on effect of this delivery system in the treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. It is one of the widely spreading diseases and theranostics is trying to make the scenario better. The review suggests the pitfall of the current system and how theranostics can help. It describes the mechanism used to generate its effect and believes that interventional nanotheranostics do have a future with rainbow color. The article also describes the current hindrance to the flourishing of this miraculous technology.

Keywords: Interventional Nanotheranostics, HCC, Nanoparticle, Liver Cancer, SELEX

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is continual primary liver cancer. It is the concern of a vast population. It is the fourth most common cause of cancer mortality and the sixth most frequent carcinoma overall [1]. The main culprit behind being catastrophic is the lack of diagnosis at the early stage due to the absence of symptoms. Approximately, 90% of all primary hepatic malignancies are hepatocellular carcinomas, which pose a serious global health issue [2]. The World Health Organization predicts that more than 1 million people would pass away from liver cancer in 2030, based on yearly predictions [3]. Despite being a worldwide issue, the prevalence of HCC is not evenly distributed. Eastern Asia and sub-Saharan Africa have the highest rates of HCC. Additionally, it poses a significant concern in countries like the United States, Europe, and Japan [4]. The topographical risk factor is always shifting due to vaccination rates and current advancements in medical treatments. As discussed in the staging system, there are multiple bodies with different biases of classification. Although not completely reliable, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) is the most accepted staging system to date. Very early stage (0) has a single nodule and early stage (A) have single or up to three nodule formation. Till the intermediate stage (B), which has multifocal tumor formation limited to the liver, all stages are asymptomatic as liver function is preserved. In the advanced stage (C), extrahepatic spread along with portal invasion is observed. Patients with end-stage illness (D) have severe cancer-related symptoms or have impaired liver function and here even liver transplantation cannot improve the condition [5].

Occurrence

The occurrence of HCC is a tedious and complex process. The basic pathology of HCC is hepatocyte necrosis and regeneration, together with fibrotic deposition, which are all factors in the multistep, complicated process that leads to the development of HCC. The risk appears after cirrhosis is developed, and it rises along with deteriorating liver function [6]. It is affected by various factors and yet we are not able to find the major reason for the HCC. However, we have some influencing factors to accelerate or worsen the condition. Predominantly, the viral load of diseases such as hepatitis B and hepatitis C [7]. Along with this, other high-risk factors include mutation of genes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), aflatoxin, metabolic disorders such as diabetes, obesity, and many more.

Hepatitis B, having partial double-stranded circular DNA, leads to chronic hepatitis at the initial stage. Cirrhosis develops as a result of the body's immunological response, which includes inflammation, oxidative stress, and the necrosis of liver cells. Telomerase is activated again by cirrhosis in cells. Telomeres shorten with each subsequent cell division, however, in malignant or defective cells, telomerase is reactivated, preventing it from happening [8]. This resulted in atypical cell division and the development of HCC. It is observed that there are 100 folds more chances of a person with HBV compare to a normal individual [9]. In addition to this consequence, it also caused chromosomal instability and the loss of a tumor-suppressing gene. When this gene is altered, the defective gene is not deleted, which might again result in HCC. Similarly, hepatitis C leads to successive cirrhosis and at last HCC. HCC still has a high rate of morbidity and death due to the rising of cirrhosis in HCV. Both viral diseases are the major cause of HCC [10]. The most frequent somatic change in HCC is aberrant telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) activation, which can occur as a result of promoter mutations, viral integrations, or localized amplification [11].

Aflatoxin B1 is frequently ingested together with contaminated grains, and liver cytochrome p450 breaks it down. Once digested, it functions as a DNA mutator to cause the transversion of G to T in TP53's codon 249's third position [12]. HBV and aflatoxin show a synergistic action. NAFLD progression leads to inflammatory response and hence the risk factor for the development of HCC. Diabetes is a contributing factor and it is observed that a person with a high body-mass index and insulin resistance is more susceptible [13]. Talking about environmental factors is crucial as they influence the progression of the disease. Excessive alcohol consumption leads to the destruction of liver cells and causes inflammation and necrosis. It intensifies the symptoms and progression of HCC [14]. Tobacco, consumed when a person is already infected by viral disease (HBV/HCV) exaggerated the situation.

Complications

HCC is a dangerous condition that necessitates prompt diagnosis and treatment to prevent further deterioration. It enables the doctor to treat the patient's symptoms and enhance both the patient's life expectancy and lifestyle. The accurate detection helps to find the core error in the body, along with its immune system to concentrate the treatment. Facing problems in treatment for world's one of the most prevalent diseases is a burden on the health care system that needs to resolve.

In Diagnosis

The progression of HCC completely relies on the stage when the disease is successfully diagnosed. Patients which are diagnosed with cirrhosis often develop HCC. It can cause hepatic problems such as hepatic encephalopathy, portal vein thrombosis, worsening ascites, variceal hemorrhage, obstructive jaundice, and pyogenic liver abscess. A potentially fatal HCC consequence is intraperitoneal hemorrhage [15] [16]. There are different types of diagnostic methods to confirm HCC such as X-Ray, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Computed Tomography (CT)scam, Liver Biopsy, Serum Alpha-Fetoprotein (AFP), Ultrasonography, and many more. Among these, all diagnostic tests, liver ultrasonography, and serum alpha-fetoprotein are the two most popular methods. For non-invasive techniques, liver ultrasonography and serum AFP are the most popular ones whereas liver biopsy is preferred as the invasive method [17].

Liver ultrasonography is an imaging technique that uses highly intense sound waves which gives real-time images or videos of internal body structure like organs, soft tissues, and blood vessels. It also gives information regarding the stage of HCC but the detection of the type of focal liver lesion (FLL) accurately and the recognition between HCC and non-HCC, particularly in cirrhosis and other chronic hepatic condition presence is the major challenge in conventional liver sonography [18]. Another complication is associated with instrument standardization and patient disease condition as it varies from person to person. Thus, regular screening is required to avoid minor challenges [19].

AFP is another common diagnostic method after liver ultrasonography for the detection of HCC. AFP is an important tumor biomarker as a diagnostic tool. The level of AFP elevates in three conditions: liver cancer or testicular cancer, pregnancy, and sometimes in non-cancerous diseases such as cirrhosis and hepatitis. It can lead to a false assumption about HCC. Serum AFP levels in healthy persons normally range from 5 to 10 ng/mL. However, the AFP level of 400 ng/ml is a set as prejudicial between hepatocellular cancer and chronic diseases such as cirrhosis or hepatitis. Due to this reason (less sensitivity and accuracy) some controversial studies have a disagreement with the usage of AFP level as a screening method in HCC patients [20]. The AFP measurement is unsatisfactory since 80% of cases of small hepatocellular carcinoma do not show an elevation in AFP values which is one of the limitations of this diagnostic method [21].

Liver biopsy, being an invasive method, has drawbacks due to patient discomfort. NASH must be definitively diagnosed, and liver biopsy is regarded as highly helpful in separating NASH from other disorders, determining a prognosis, and evaluating the outcomes of therapeutic intervention. However, liver biopsy has several limitations and is often ineffective in non-advanced patients. Furthermore, even if NASH is diagnosed by liver biopsy, there is no known therapy for it. Pathologists disagree in their diagnosis and recognition of liver biopsy results. Additionally, there is a chance of “tumor seeding” during a biopsy, in which case cancer cells spread to other tissues along the path the biopsy instrument takes. For individuals with the usual imaging characteristics of HCC, liver biopsy is not commonly performed due to these hazards [22]. During a liver biopsy, only 1/50000 of the entire liver tissue is collected, raising questions about sampling inaccuracy [23].

In Treatment

Treatments for HCC are complicated because enormous factors influence the progression of the disease. Methods like liver transplantation, ablative techniques like radiofrequency ablation, and many more are used.

Liver transplantation leads to the removal of the cancerous part of the liver and the introduction of the healthy liver part from a donor [24]. The major drawback of this system is high demand compare to less availability of donors. Also, there is the possibility of rejection due to the action of the immune system [25].

Concerning the molecular level, angiogenesis is a major factor influencing the growth of tumors [26]. There is a system to reduce this phenomenon to block growth. Drugs like Sorafenib acts by blocking the VEGF-R pathway, highlighting the promise of antiangiogenic treatments for HCC [27]. For a better therapeutic result, it is necessary to investigate the redundant and complicated angiogenic pathways. Despite being accepted as a life-extending medication for individuals with advanced HCC, sorafenib's effectiveness is highly reliant on the causes of HCC and hence is not completely reliable. Metastasis is also a serious problem of the tumor cells which hurdles the conventional system of treatments [28].

Need for a novel system

Considering all the shortcomings of diagnosis and therapy, it becomes clear that another approach must be found immediately. We cannot rely on a single technique to identify HCC during the diagnostic phase. To guarantee the outcomes, regular testing is required. Additionally, using the conventional way of diagnosis makes early-stage detection exceedingly challenging. Additionally, some accurate tests are intrusive, which is not what patients or doctors desire. In terms of treatment, a variety of medications and approaches are necessary to produce the desired pharmacological effect [29]. Additionally, even a well-known procedure like liver transplantation is ineffective for treating end-stage HCC [30]. Healthcare systems require a medication delivery system that can improvise both diagnostics and therapy with the least amount of intrusion and most impact. For that reason, The prodigious concept of Nanotheranostics same in the lime light [31].

Introduction to Nanotheranostics

Nanotheranostics is a rapidly expanding field in medicine, that combines diagnosis and therapeutics by using nanoparticles (NPs). In recent years, Nanotheranostics platforms have been suggested as a promising field in the management of cancers. The difficulties of traditional chemotherapy have been steadily getting easier because of developments in nanotechnology-based medicines delivery methods. Due to its increased efficacy and decreased side effects, nanotechnology contributes to the effective delivery of drugs to damaged tissues. Lipidic and polymeric composite nanomedicines offer a better delivery system and create novel therapeutic approaches for cancer like HCC [32,33]. Late diagnosis, the complexity of treatment, reoccurrence, and multidrug resistance lead to an increase in the mortality rate of HCC. In addition, most of the cases are diagnosed in the advanced stage of HCC so, there is a need to detect it in the early stage and ace the burden of treatment, to overcome this hurdle NPs are used as a diagnostic tool as well as a therapeutic agent nowadays [34, p. 1]. The overall potential of nanotheranostics agents is greater than traditional ones owing to simultaneous diagnosis and site-specific therapy due to which they are widely applicable [35,36]. They have unique benefits like biocompatibility, decreased toxic effects, good stability, improved permeability, more retention in tumor cells, and specific targeting ability, nanoparticles size ranges from about 1 to 1000 nm, and have the potential to treat cancer [37]. Moreover, NPs may shield the enclosed compounds from intracellular and extracellular deterioration, enhancing intracellular bioavailability but it is also affected by NPs' size, shape, functional group, etc. Different types and different shapes of NPs are also available and used according to disease pathogenesis.

NPs are colloidal structures composed of various polymers and active drugs. There are different types of NPs such as organic NPs, inorganic NPs, and hybrid NPs. The research conducted on various inorganic NPs which are used in HCC includes gold NPs (GNPs/AuNPs), alumina NPs, arsenite NPs, calcium NPs, chitosan NPs, iron oxide NPs, polyethylene NPs, platinum NPs, polysaccharide NPs, selenium NPs, silica NPs, silver NPs, etc. these are used as nano vehicles to carry anticancer drug/cargo to the site of action. To achieve these NPs various gene engineering or genetic modification methods are used [31,32]. Nanocarriers are regarded as having a high degree of site-specificity and therapeutic efficacy when it comes to the clinical delivery of a chemotherapeutic drug [32]. The polymeric coating with different polymers can also affect NPs' therapeutic action, cellular uptake, stability, and drug release at the cancer site. Various biodegradable polymers such as polyethylene glycol (PEG), natural polymers like chitosan, alginate, and synthetic polymers like polyesters are commonly used in nanoparticle formulation. However, inorganic gold NPs (GNPs) get more recognition due to their less toxicity and biological inertness [38-40]. NPs or nanomedicines should formulate in such a way that they should have enough bioavailability and be able to overcome the challenges of a conventional drug (Figure 1). NPs are suggested as they cumulate around the tumor site and release slowly which increased permeation or diffusion and retention time at the disease site [41,42].

Apart from the therapeutic application of NPs, they are also used to diagnose and detect the early stage of HCC with the help of nanotechnologies because of their electrical, optical, and magnetic properties [43]. Nanomaterials identify specific biomarkers which assist to diagnose HCC. Biomarkers are specific and different in various diseases and also provide information about disease progression. hence, the measurement of biomarkers through NPs proves a powerful tool. These types of nanomaterial are also known as nanosensors. They are capable to measure a large number of biomarkers in small samples. NPs that are coupled to a specific ligand often form the basis of nanosensors. The ligand identifies the target molecule, while the nanoparticle functions as a signal generator or detector, and together they determine sensitivity, these make nanosensors highly specific. Various NPs such as metallic NPs, magnetic NPs, or nanotubes are used to detect targets like antibodies, proteins, enzymes, etc. [44,45]. Drug development is a time-consuming, expensive endeavour that calls for multidisciplinary skills [46]. For the screening of drugs, molecular docking is virtual platform which is used in early phase of drug discovery [47]. There are more than 250 approved drugs which uses bio-informatics tools in discovery procedure [48].

 Figure 1 

Illustration of the overall working of the interventional drug. The molecule, due to binding with particles such as nanoparticles, has gained its site-specific property. Due to it, the delivery of drugs becomes way easier and free from systemic toxicity. Along with that, the attached molecule consists of special characteristics, which lead to the identification of the location of the tumor present in the body. To sum up, it holds both therapeutic and diagnostic properties simultaneously.

Mechanism of action of nanoparticles in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The NPs used to treat HCC have different physical and chemical properties which reflect in their delivery and mechanism by which they act and it is also affected by some other factors. So, it is not completely possible to standardize any one mechanism of NPs in the case of HCC but here, we review the cellular uptake mechanism that is most commonly followed by cargo polysaccharide NPs. Besides this, some NPs also respond to external stimulation like ultrasound stimulation, heat, pH, light, etc., these types of NPs can release drugs in a controlled manner which can increase more precision and targeting of drug delivery [49,50].

Gold NPs, liposomes, and chitosan-based NPs are the most common examples that are often used in the treatment of HCC [51]. These NPs experience cellular uptake mechanisms in cancerous cells of the liver. Gold NPs used to carry drugs or active constituents on their surface while liposomes are filled with payload in the core of nanoliposome. The payload of NPs is facilitated by endocytosis into HCC cells, also they can penetrate via alternative pathways such as plasma membrane penetration (passive penetration). Different endocytosis processes like phagocytosis, pinocytosis, micropinocytosis, clathrin-based and caveolae-mediated endocytosis are followed by different NPs. Nanomaterials are encased within the initial endocytic vesicles during endocytosis, preventing their direct entry into the cytoplasm. While nanomaterials that are ingested by membrane penetration are immediately moved into the cytoplasm, which can be the better option in case of targeted drug delivery, after reaching their targeted site they release the drug from NPs and shows the cytotoxic effect on HCC cells [52,53]. The drugs which have less solubility and absorption are formulated in NPs for targeted drug delivery which after reaching the cancerous site and releases drugs into the microenvironment of cancer cells and stays for a longer period [49]. some of the NPs like gold nanoparticles may follow an active targeting mechanism if they are functionalized. In active targeting surface of NPs has been modified by attaching different proteins, antibodies, enzymes, and other targeting agents which results in increased efficacy of NPs by interacting with particular molecules on HCC cells.

It is crucial to target cancer-affected vasculature when treating cancer so, in this condition the lipid-based NPs provide safe and effective drug delivery at the specific cancer site. Currently, FDA-approved lipid-based NPs named liposomes are greatly used to treat HCC in which anticancer drug is enclosed with a phospholipid bilayer, providing protection against physical barriers and increasing the efficacy of the drug [54-56]. Cancer is a multistep complex process. It's an abnormal cell growth that is characterized by new irregular blood vessel formation or angiogenesis (tumor vasculature). These blood vessels are leaky, and porous and have different endothelial membranes than normal blood vessels. Liposomes take advantage EPR effect (enhanced permeation and retention effect) of the leaking neo vasculature and passively concentrate near inflamed malignant cells, the EPR effect is caused by lack of adequate lymphatic outflow and increased permeability of tumor blood vessels [57-60]. After reaches to the site of the cancer lipid-based, NPs are undergone endocytosis by the cellular uptake mechanism and release the anticancer drug from nanoparticle formulation and inhibit tumor growth or result in cancerous cell death. Liposome efficacy may be affected by different polymeric materials. Nowadays, biodegradable polymers like PEGylated liposomes (PLS) are frequently explored as they improve hydrophobic drugs' solubility, half-life, and efficacy via the EPR effect [61].

Gold NPs are also well known in the target-specific treatment of HCC. The gold NPs show their effect by inhibiting the cytochrome P450(CYP) enzymes at a cellular and molecular level. Gold NPs are mostly used in the detection of HCC. The surface of gold NPs bears a negative charge due to which we can modify it with different drugs, genes, and other biomolecules. Further, they bind with a specific target through which we can detect it. Moreover, gold NPs can also reduce chemotherapy resistance if they are given in conjugation with other drugs. Apart from this oxidative stress gene expression is also altered by gold particles which suggests that they also have apoptosis and necrosis cell death activity which may produce a toxic effect on healthy cells of the liver [62], [62,63]. Another example of NPs that are used in HCC and still under research is chitosan NPs. These are continuous drug-release systems. The experimental study on chitosan NPs suggests a mechanism of action that cargo-loaded NPs cause internal irradiation and consequently, lead to increased cell death by apoptosis and DNA destruction in cancer-affected liver cells [64].

Advantages over traditional therapy

Interventional nanothernostics is the emerging platform that is required to overcome the drawbacks of the traditional system for the management of HCC. Nanoparticles with dominant sensitivity and specificity have been developed to address the problem of ailment diagnosis that occurs too late [65]. This approach facilitates the targeted accumulation of therapeutic payload inside tumor lesions. They have the property of tissue penetration. This helps them to detect even the minute tumor in the liver. They selectively bind to the tumor cell and help in diagnosis (identification) by enhancing the effectiveness and intensity of therapeutic agents by preventing metastasis, and tumor invasion, and blocking the angiogenesis pathway. It is also concluded in the trial phase that it improves the therapeutic index even in patients with higher stages. It is utilized in emergencies [36]. When all the benefits are considered, it is the least hazardous to non-target cells. This lessens the likelihood of unpleasant side effects like hair loss, anemia, nausea, cardiotoxicity, and many more [66]. Tumors often have a high level of intricacy and heterogeneity. Because of heterogeneity, tumor development differs from person to person, and amazingly, even when the same individual has many tumors. As a result of this capacity, it does not react to therapy well and develops resistance to it [67]. When compared to conventional chemotherapeutic medicines, nanotheranostics, which have both diagnostic and therapeutic properties, have a considerable deal of success. Its advantage can be studied in detail under the given sub-categories.

Diagnostic and therapeutics

The specific marker for detecting HCC is AFP. However, it stimulates the growth of new cells, which advances the tumor. A nanotheranostics is created when an aptamer (NP) binds to AFP, reducing AFP's capacity to cause cell division [68]. It gets picked up by SELEX (Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment) [69]. The complex was found to be efficient, time-saving, and high-resolution. Magnetic NP with drugs such as Doxorubicin hydrochloride (anticancer) provides additional advantages such as minimal toxicity, a tiny, homogeneous geometrical size, good water stability, and distinctive MRI characteristics [70].

Enhancing therapeutics

Due to multi-drug resistance (MDR), doxorubicin does not function as an anti-tumor agent alone. Overexpression of the ATP-binding cassette causes MDR [71]. Reducing the function of ABC as a result of interaction with nanoparticles lowers the likelihood that a medication would cause MDR, improving therapeutic outcomes. Another illustration is the targeted delivery of Beclin 1 siRNA using calcium phosphate nanoparticles (NP) to boost the effectiveness of the therapeutic drug [72].

Diagnostic and targeted-imaging

An activatable aptamer-based fluorescence probe (AAFP) is used to detect the presence of HCC. When a tumor is present, it produces a lot of light rather than emitting little fluorescence when one is absent. It is an effective method for spotting HCC early. It eliminates the requirement to maintain the optimum structure and additional moiety as fluorescent to get the desired result [73]. Streptavidin is conjugated with carboxyl-modified FITC-doped silica nanoparticles, which results in exceptionally high specificity and decent sensitivity. No toxic effect of this complex was observed [74].

Gene editing

CRISPR is an emerging element in both gene therapy as well as diagnosis. Sorafenib, a medication that has been clinically indicated as a multi-kinase inhibitor to treat HCC, was more effective in treating HCC cell lines when ERK2 kinases were inhibited by CRISPR/Cas9. In order to defend against viral DNA invasion, the CRISPR/Cas9 system was initially found in bacteria and archaea [75]. Gene editing uses various vectors such as adenoviral vector, viral vector, lentiviral vaccine, RNA viral vector, exosomes and many more [76].

Administration of interventional nanotheranostics

NPs are administered orally, through intravenous, pulmonary, transdermal, or intraarterial routes based on the type of cancer and part of the body affected by cancer. Among these, all routes of administration oral administration are the widely accepted route for the treatment of various cancers especially, in HCC. However, it is the most difficult path also. In the case of HCC, drugs can be administered through the oral and intraarterial routes of administration.

NPs that are mostly given by oral route has an advantage like localized drug delivery at the tumor lesion site, and as it is a non-invasive method, they can be easily administered. Apart from this protein and biological products can also be given in form of oral NPs formulations which can improve their bioavailability as compared to conventional but oral NPs formulation also faces challenges like first-pass metabolism, intestinal mucosal uptake, and microenvironment of tumor site, For the systemic delivery of NPs they are given by intravenous route but they also have disadvantages like first pass metabolism, and systemic toxicity and similarly other routes have also their pros and cons [77].

Oral administration of NPs is the most preferable mode in HCC. Research shows that Oral formulation of cargo-loaded NPs is more efficient and safer to treat targeted HCC than other routes. Other advantages of the oral formulation of NPs have enhanced bioavailability, increased drug solubility and stability, protection against pH, enzyme degradations, and other factors like patient compliance. A study on the efficiency and safety of apo transferrin(apodoxonano) and lactoferrin(lactodoxonano) NPs loaded with doxorubicin revealed improved bioavailability, safety, and efficacy when they are administered orally [78,79].

A category of therapy known as intra-arterial interventions for ineradicable HCC uses catheters to deliver medicated and /or embolic chemicals intra-arterially (via arteries) to specific tumor lesions. Intraarterial therapies include Selective internal radioembolization therapy (SIRT), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), drug-eluting beads-trans arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE), bland embolization (TAE), and hepatic artery infusion [80,81]. A study on intra-arterial administration of doxorubicin-loaded NPs revealed an enhanced overall life span but it also harms the respiratory tract [82, p.].

Different nanoparticles used in nanotheranostics

NPs can be widely categorized into several groups based on their shapes, size, and chemical characteristics. Some of the different organic NPs, inorganic NPs, and hybrid NPs are used in cancer treatment. Organic NPs include liposome-based NPs, polymer-based NPs, and dendrimers whereas inorganic NPs include gold NPs, carbon-based NPs, silica NPs, magnetic NPs, and quantum dots. Hybrid NPs (least used) include lipid-polymer hybrid NPs, organic-inorganic hybrid NPs, and cell membrane-coated NPs [83,84]. However, the NPs that are mostly used in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer are carbon-based, Lipid NPs, metallic NPs, silica NPs, quantum dots, nanoshells, dendrimers, and superparamagnetic FeO NPs [43]. Additionally, certain phytochemicals that are utilized as nanocarriers have specialized actions including changing cellular composition and enhancing the effectiveness of anticancer medications [85,86].

Carbon-based nanoparticles

Carbon-based NPs have been used to diagnose malignancy or administer medications to specific areas of the body. In carbon-based NPs, carbon nanotubes (CNT), fullerenes (FUL), graphene (GRP) and its derivatives, carbon-based quantum dots, nanodiamonds, and graphene oxides are taken into account as they are used as drug carriers, also in diagnosis and photodynamic therapy in cancer nanotheranostics. CNT has a hollow cylindrical, elongated shape with a diameter of 1-2 nm and distinct physiochemical and biological features which allows their utility in diagnosis and targeted drug delivery in HCC. CNT can be rolled into a single sheet, double sheets, and multi sheets. So that they are known as single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), double-walled carbon nanotubes (DWCNTs), and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) respectively. They also have a large capacity for anticancer drugs loading to their cylindrical shapes such as doxorubicin, methotrexate siRNA and paclitaxel can be delivered by CNT. Additionally, they are used in thermal ablation therapies because of their heat-generation ability when subjected to infrared radiation [87]. Among the variety of NPs, CNT is the most suitable for biosensor applications due to its great mechanical strength, superior electrical conduction, optical and thermal properties, and capability to function as an effective signal transducer. As a result, they are used as a diagnostic tool to measure or quantify specific biomarkers in various tumors. Although CNT is still in its infancy because of contradictory findings regarding its toxic effects which may be because of variations in synthesis and other parameters that can affect drug delivery. Moreover, in in-vivo models, they show tissue build-up brought on by repetitive exposure to CNT due to their delayed disruptive kinetics. Thus, CNT is still a hot topic for researchers to explore its advantages and utilization in diagnosis and treatment [88-90].

Apart from CNTs, fullerenes and graphene are getting attention for their use in cancer treatment. Fullerenes are the pure form of carbons and are spherical. Fullerenes are varying in size; the largest form of fullerene contains 1500 atoms of carbon and the smallest one contains 20 carbon atoms. Generally, the C60 form of fullerene is widely acceptable and stable. With their considerable anticancer activity and great biocompatibility, adequately engineered fullerene NPs have a wide range of potential applications in anticancer therapy, especially in photodynamic therapy (PDT). fullerenes derivatives also have activity like promotion of the immune system, suppression of tumor angiogenesis, prevention of multiple drug resistance, and most important antioxidant activity. However, their utility in the medical field is limited due to their highly hydrophobic nature and propensity to agglomerate in aqueous solvents. This can be resolved by the derivatization technique in which polar groups are added to fullerenes [90-92]. Graphene and its derivatives also possess numerous exceptional and distinct physical and chemical features; hence they are frequently developed as revolutionary molecules to incorporate into various therapies such as phototherapy (photothermal and photodynamic therapy), chemotherapies, and imaging tools for tumor treatment [93,94]. In conclusion, carbon-based various NPs in cancer therapy are emerging fields right away.

Lipid-based nanoparticles

One of the most popular NPs for HCC nanotheranostics is lipid-based nanoparticles such as liposomes, solid lipid NPs (SLN), and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC). Among these, liposomes are the most widely used in cancer therapy. Liposomes are also known as vesicles or simple lipids and are typically between 50 to 200 nm in size and spherical shaped. Phospholipids and cholesterols are the basic need to create liposomes [95,96]. Liposomes comprise a lipophilic bilayer and the hydrophilic core part which enables the encapsulation of hydrophobic and hydrophilic drugs into liposomes [97]. Generally, hydrophilic material encapsulates in the core part whereas, lipophilic material is incorporated into the lipid bilayer. Doxorubicin, sorafenib, and siRNA are often encapsulated in various types of liposomes. The main purpose of encapsulation is to protect the active drug from degradation by the immune system [96,98]. Numerous biological applications, particularly in the field of drug administration, have been made possible by the distinctive qualities of liposomes, such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, amphiphilicity, less toxic effects, non-ionicity, prolonged drug release, and site-specific action [96,99]. Liposomes are mainly used as drug carriers because of their superior carrier qualities and mobility. The clinical data of PEGylated liposomes loaded with doxorubicin revealed increased efficacy in the treatment of HCC because of its ability to carry the drug safely to the HCC cells. They are also assisting with imaging diagnoses and therapies for cancers. Additionally, they are also used in combination therapies [88]. Liposomes' surface has frequently been modified to increase their circulation and distribution in the blood which ultimately improves the efficacy of the anticancer drug [100]. For example, HCC cells expressed specific receptors like the asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR) which is selective for glycoproteins, particularly D-galactose or galactosamine. Thus, to target paclitaxel anticancer drug to HCC cells, scientists created unique ASGPR-targeting poly (polyethylene glycol paclitaxel) (PTX) nanoliposomes that contain PTX and active ligands which directly strike HCC cells. As a result, it improved drug efficacy and decreases the toxic effect of the drug on a cell other than HCC cells. Apart from surface engineering, attachment of targeting agents and polymer coating also improve targeted drug delivery. For instance, SP94‑targeted PEGylated liposomal DOX (SP94‑LD) which contains SP94 peptide onto polyethylene glycolate polymer coated (PEGylated) liposomes loaded with doxorubicin, shows tissue accumulation near cancerous cells by EPR effect and active targeting effect [88,96]. However, liposome interaction with cancerous cells is affected by liposome composition, diameter, charges present on surfaces, etc. [101]. Currently, there are many liposomes' products available on the market that are approved to treat different diseases, and there are still researches ongoing to making stable liposomes because physical and chemical stabilities of liposomes formulation is the major obstacle. So, it's necessary to develop stable and efficient liposomes [102].

Metallic nanoparticles

Metallic NPs have a potent and advantageous impact on cancer therapy as they have the potential to be used as multipurpose agents, and investigation raising continuously on metal NPs. Examples of metallic NPs include Gold NPs (AuNPs), silver, magnesium, iron, copper, calcium, zinc, and many more. Among them, Gold NPs are the leading nanoparticles right now [103,104]. AuNPs are available in different shapes (nanoshell, nanorod, nanocage, hollow nanosphere, and many others) and sizes of about 25-200 nm. Owning various physical, chemical, optical, electrical, and biological properties, AuNPs are applicable in a wide variety of scientific fields including medicine. Functionalized AuNPs i.e., attachment of different molecules like anticancer drugs, antibodies, enzymes, fluorescent dyes, etc on the surface of AuNPs directly reflect in their conjugation, cellular uptake, cytotoxicity, and interaction with cancerous cells. research studies on AuNPs show that their toxicity can be correlated to size, surface functionality, and charges present on the surface [105,106]. AuNPs are good contrast agents because of the great absorbance of X-rays in the imaging diagnosis of tumors. AuNPs also has potential application as drug carrier and in gene therapy. Additionally used in phototherapies (including PTT and PDT), and radiosensitizer [38,107,108]. The use of gold nanoparticles as cancer nanotheranostics must overcome several obstacles, including biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, and potential toxicity [109]. As we earlier mentioned, Apart from AuNPs many other metallic NPs are also utilized for cancer treatment. The use of NPs as interventional nanotheranostics tools has increased over the past few years, and further research is still required to develop more potent and efficient treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Drugs under clinical trials

A clinical trial is required to prove the effectiveness of the drug and its combinations. Clinical trials, with the help of advance technology and living volunteers, such as animals named rodent and smaller animals, and human volunteer, both healthy as well as patient, ensures the better understanding of the moiety and help to reduce the gap between theoretical assumption and actual effect. It describes the multi-target effect of molecule [110]. Refer Figure 2 for a case study illustrating the effect of nanotheranostics in HCC patient.

Before the actual treatment, diagnosis of angiography is crucial. The treatment stimulant, technetium-99m-macroaggregated albumin (^99mTc-MAA), is administered in the body which is detected by single-photon emission CT (SPECT) to evaluate the dose required for the treatment of tumor [111]. This step is crucial as it leads to personalized delivery of drug to the targeted site [112].

Along with the being a helping hand in targeted delivery, it has its own therapeutic efficacy. Some of them are described in the given Table 1.

HCC is typically diagnosed at an intermediate or late stage. An effective treatment is required to prevent further loss of liver functions in these stages. According to the BCLC classification of HCC in an intermediate stage, an asymptomatic, multinodular, noninvasive liver is observed. To treat the intermediate stage of HCC, transarterial chemoembolism (TACE) is preferred as a standard treatment. TACE is administered via percutaneous injection. First of all, a catheter is inserted in the lumen of a blood vessel, which is used to carry the cytotoxic drug only to the cancerous cells of the liver. The name “chemoembolism” itself suggests that chemotherapeutic agents with embolizing agents are involved in this treatment. Chemotherapeutic agents destroy the cancerous cells, while embolizing agents stop or block the blood vessel temporarily to perform the TACE procedure. Cytotoxic drugs that are given to treat tumour cells are emulsified with lipoidal (contrast medium), followed by embolization [113-115].

 Figure 2 

Interventional nanotheranostics treatment in a 63-year-old-male HCC patient. (A) It demonstrates the growing tumor in the caudate lobe near the HCC (arrowed part). (B) The pre-treatment with 99mTc-MAA describes the super-selective accumulation in caudate lobe. (C) Because of the pre-treatment with 99mTc-MAA, the targeted delivery of 90Y-microsphere (therapeutic agent) shows excellent tumor targeting. (D) The image shows a complete disappearance of growing tumor after 3-month therapy with SIRT because of the targeted delivery. (Adopted under CC by 4 licences from [112]).

TACE can be performed by two distinct methods: conventional TACE or by using drug-eluting beads with TACE (DEB-TACE). The former method is normal and includes anticancer drug delivery followed by embolization. whereas the second method includes drug-eluting beads (DEB), which slowly release the anticancer drug to enhance the intensity and drug exposure at the cancerous site. Hence, it modifies the pharmacokinetic profile of treatment, which is not the case with conventional TACE. Clinical research data on DEB loaded with doxorubicin shows less systemic and liver toxicity [116-118].

The thermosensitive liposomal formulation of doxorubicin is commercialized under the tradename ThermoDox. Doxorubicin is the first agent in the thermal-sensitive category of liposome formulations that are tried in clinical studies. In clinical trials, ThermoDox is used in combination with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to potentially evaluate the effect of formulation at the HCC tumor site. RFA is used in combination because it provides mild thermal energy and can cause hyperthermia which ultimately enhances ThermoDox effectiveness. The OPTIMA trial is conducted first to evaluate ThermoDox efficacy when used in conjunction with RFA as compared to the use of RFA therapy alone.

ThermoDox is a liposomal formulation with a doxorubicin payload as an active anticancer drug. The mechanism behind the action of this thermosensitive liposomal formulation is, when they are subjected to heat, they release drugs at the tumor site by the opening of pores of the lipid bilayer or enhancing lipid bilayer permeation. RFA provides heat that causes a rise in body temperature up to 42 Celsius and an increase in body tissue temperature of approximately 39 to 42 Celsius is known as hyperthermia. blood flow and oxygenation in body tissue are high in hyperthermia which is beneficial in drug delivery. For the pictorial presentation, refer Figure 3. Moreover, ThermoDox with RFA therapy produces a high drug concentration of doxorubicin as compared to free doxorubicin near the ablation zone due to hyperthermia [119,120,121].

The formulation of ThermoDox was made of Lysphospholipids, which ensures the phase transition temperature of liposomes is lowered to around 40 °C. As a result, when heated, they can be regulated to change their structural makeup and release the drug payload through openings in the liposome (Dox). The ThermoDox formulation also has a short half-life so it required immediate thermal ablation therapy after administration of formulation to achieve its maximum effect The slow drug release of this formulation was a major challenge and as it releases the drugs only above the transition temperature of liposome, it releases the maximum 70% of drugs from the formulation. These factors contributed to the failure of clinical trials of ThermoDox formulation [122,123,124,125].

There is a vast area for research and development in such a miraculous moiety. This review clamor to more trials and studies on interventional nanotheranostics concerning HCC to overcome the drawbacks of current healthcare systems.

 Figure 3 

The delivery of the drug by ThermoDox. It describes the effect of elevated temperature leads to release of drug from the lipoidal moiety. This effectively decreases the tumor.

Current hurdles in using nanotheranostics and future aspects

Nanotechnology has grown immensely in the last few decades. It is applicable in almost all fields including engineering and medical also. NPs are used to diagnose and treat various diseases especially, in cancer treatment nanotheranostics have a great impact on cancer treatment than conventional drugs. With the advancement in nanotechnology, we can potentially improve cancer treatment however, right now we are facing many challenges in development and its potential use in imaging and treatment.

Some of the major hurdles in the development of NPs are particle sizes and shapes, characteristics of NPs, components, and analysis of NPs formulation, regulatory and pharmacological challenges as well as safety and efficacy requirements for approval of NPs [32,38]. Nanomedicine or NPs need to be thoroughly studied in its investigation stages because every minor change can significantly affect NP's safety and efficacy. Moreover, particle size directly affects its biodistribution, drug PK and effectiveness of NPs. For example, Smaller NPs (20-30 nm) rapidly undergo renal clearance while particle size 200 nm or larger than that is actively taken up by organs like the liver and spleen, particularly particle sizes ranging between 150-300 nm. Particle size also varies depending on the route of administration for instance particle size should be small in intravenous than in oral formulation [39,40,42]. Half-life also had an impact on the treatment of cancer. NPs enter tumor cells via leaky blood vessels so if NPs have a longer half-life, they remain in blood circulation for a longer period then there are more chances of entering of NPs into cancerous cells and enhanced treatment outcomes. Additionally, with the help of PEG rapid clearance can be reduced. Hence, to achieve a long half-life PEG is attached to the NP's surface but excessive use might be disadvantageous [41]. pharmacological effects prediction is the presently major obstacle in the development of NPs since there are currently no reliable in vivo models to forecast the wide range of behaviours of the various types of nanoparticles being studied, the creation of nanoparticles with desirable features has to rely on empirical data and substantial preclinical animal testing. Similarly in the context of analysis and characterization, due to the complex structure of nanomedicine, it required more sophisticated testing to understand different functional groups and their nature for example, to what extent active drug-loaded NPs can bind to specific targeted receptors and cells and what modification needs to be done for more effectiveness [32]. A nonspecific build-up of nanoparticles could harm healthy tissue in cancer treatment that uses external sources of energy like ionizing radiation or infrared radiation. This threat can be reduced by using image-based management in the in vivo model, in which NPs dispersion has to be assessed. So, for these types of energy-based treatment, the distribution of medications supplied by NPs can be examined simultaneously using imaging techniques that have not yet been fully explored by researchers. Hence, to observe the activation of NPs straightforward imaging technology need to be explored [43]. Apart from these active targeting of NPs also hurdles in the treatment of cancers. NPs are actively directed to the specific cancerous cells by adding some targeting moieties such as antibodies, ligands, transferrin, etc. to the surface of NPs. These will help to interact with molecules or receptors present on the surface of the targeted cell. Hence, the ratio of interacting moieties and targeted surface molecules should be studied to efficiently cross the barrier and cellular uptake and these make active targeting more difficult. Moreover, the target selection process is personalized because disease molecules and biomarkers vary in every patient and their disease condition [44]. In the present scenario, the manufacturing of NPs is another big obstacle. it's important to note that nanoparticles are not just simple combinations and additions of different parts. Instead, they are comprehensive compositions with a complex structure. Throughout the formulation process and until the final product, the structural, physical, and chemical characteristics of integrated NPs must be maintained because numerous factors can affect manufacturing, for example, nanomaterial storage temperature, pH, humidity, stability, sterile condition, and other processing methods including proper solvent selection and method of preparation. Therefore, full care should be taken to make efficient and affordable NPs products [38,45,49]. Despite all these hurdles, NPs research is continuously raising especially in tumor treatment and if scientists will overcome these problems, NPs therapy can be used as a standard and promising to decrease the mortality rate of cancer.

Conclusion

Nanotheranostics is the emerging field that ensures the safe delivery and management of the disease. It works on a molecular as well as the cellular level to enhance the effect of the drug and decrease the level of extracellular toxicity. There is various particle that is used to serve this purpose, gold NP, liposome-based NP, and many more. This particle has a variety of uses, including targeted delivery, medical diagnostics, lowering toxicity, and many more. There are still many of opportunities for development and study to gain a deeper comprehension of ideas that might provide great achievement. Nanotheranostics may be used to successfully predict the future of many fatal diseases. It will provide the secure administration of many powerful medications, whose action on healthy cells makes them dangerous at the moment. The effective medication delivery method can successfully overcome this obstacle.

Abbreviations

AAFP: aptamer-based fluorescence probe; ABC: antibody biopolymer conjugate; AFP: alpha-fetoprotein; ASGPR: asialoglycoprotein receptor; BCLC: barcelona clinic liver cancer; CNT: carbon nanotubes; CRISPR: clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats; CT: computed tomography; CYP: cytochrome; DEB-TACE: drug-eluting beads-trans arterial chemoembolization; DNA: deoxyribonucleic acid; DWCNTs: double-walled carbon nanotubes; ERK2: extracellular signal-regulating kinases; FeO: ferric oxide; FLL: focal liver lesion; FUL: fullerenes; GNPs: gold nanoparticles; GRP: graphene; HBV: hepatitis b virus; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; HCV: hepatitis c virus; MDR: multi-drug resistance; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; MWCNTs: multi-walled carbon nanotubes; NAFLD: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; NLC: nanostructured lipid carriers; NPs: nanoparticles; PDT: photodynamic therapy; PEG: polyethylene glycol; PTX: polyethylene glycol paclitaxel; RFA: radiofrequency ablation; RNA: ribonucleic acid; SELEX: systematic evaluation of ligands by exponential enrichment; siRNA: small interfering rna; SIRT: selective internal radioembolization therapy; SLN: solid lipid nanoparticles; SWCNTs: single-walled carbon nanotubes; TACE: transarterial chemoembolization; TAE: bland embolization; 99mTc-MAA: technetium-99m-macroaggregated albumin; TERT: telomerase reverse transcriptase; VEGF-R: vascular endothelial growth factor receptor.

Acknowledgements

V.P.C. wants to dedicate this work to the L. M. College of Pharmacy as a part of the 75^th anniversary of the college. Figures are created with Biorender.com.

Author Contributions

Vivek P Chavda created the plot of the work and wrote the first draft with Pankti C. Balar, and Srushti B. Patel. Vivek P Chavda critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

References

1. Villanueva A. Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Longo DL, editor. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1450-1462

2. Global Burden of Disease Liver Cancer Collaboration, Akinyemiju T, Abera S. et al. The Burden of Primary Liver Cancer and Underlying Etiologies From 1990 to 2015 at the Global, Regional, and National Level: Results From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:1683-1691

3. Anstee QM, Reeves HL, Kotsiliti E. et al. From NASH to HCC: current concepts and future challenges. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16:411-428

4. Lafaro KJ, Demirjian AN, Pawlik TM. Epidemiology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2015;24:1-17

5. Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. The Lancet. 2018;391:1301-1314

6. Vij M, Calderaro J. Pathologic and molecular features of hepatocellular carcinoma: An update. World J Hepatol. 2021;13:393-410

7. Chavda VP, Ertas YN, Walhekar V. et al. Advanced Computational Methodologies Used in the Discovery of New Natural Anticancer Compounds. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:702611

8. in der Stroth L, Tharehalli U, Günes C. et al. Telomeres and Telomerase in the Development of Liver Cancer. Cancers. 2020;12:2048

9. Arbuthnot P, Kew M. Hepatitis B virus and hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Exp Pathol. 2001;82:77-100

10. Axley P, Ahmed Z, Ravi S. et al. Hepatitis C Virus and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Narrative Review. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2018;6:79-84

11. Kotiyal S, Evason KJ. Exploring the Interplay of Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase and β-Catenin in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers. 2021;13:4202

12. HAMID AS, TESFAMARIAM IG, ZHANG Y. et al. Aflatoxin B1-induced hepatocellular carcinoma in developing countries: Geographical distribution, mechanism of action and prevention. Oncol Lett. 2013;5:1087-1092

13. Li X, Wang X, Gao P. Diabetes Mellitus and Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. BioMed Res Int. 2017;2017:5202684

14. Morgan TR, Mandayam S, Jamal MM. Alcohol and hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:S87-S96

15. Asafo-Agyei KO, Samant H. Hepatocellular Carcinoma. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 [cited. 2022 Sep 18]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559177/

16. Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). Causes, Symptoms, Treatments & Prognosis [Internet]. Clevel. Clin. [cited. 2022 Sep 18]. Available from: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/21709-hepatocellular-carcinoma-hcc

17. Yang JD, Heimbach JK. New advances in the diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma. BMJ. 2020;371:m3544

18. Murakami T, Imai Y, Okada M. et al. Ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: toward improved treatment decisions. Oncology. 2011;81(Suppl 1):86-99

19. Wang W, Wei C. Advances in the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Genes Dis. 2020;7:308-319

20. Jasirwan COM, Fahira A, Siregar L. et al. The alpha-fetoprotein serum is still reliable as a biomarker for the surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma in Indonesia. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020;20:215

21. Tzartzeva K, Obi J, Rich NE. et al. Surveillance Imaging and Alpha Fetoprotein for Early Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Cirrhosis: A Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:1706-1718.e1

22. Hepatocellular Carcinoma [Internet]. NORD Natl. Organ. Rare Disord. [cited. 2022 Sep 18]. Available from: https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/hepatocellular-carcinoma/

23. Sumida Y, Nakajima A, Itoh Y. Limitations of liver biopsy and non-invasive diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. World J Gastroenterol WJG. 2014;20:475-485

24. Mazzaferro V, Chun YS, Poon RTP. et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1001-1007

25. Yao FY, Fidelman N. Reassessing the boundaries of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Where do we stand with tumor down-staging?. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2016;63:1014-1025

26. Jain RK. Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy. Science. 2005;307:58-62

27. Tang W, Chen Z, Zhang W. et al. The mechanisms of sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma: theoretical basis and therapeutic aspects. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5:87

28. Bae SY, Kim HJ, Oh HH. et al. Multiple Bone Metastases as the First Manifestation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patient with Noncirrhotic Liver. Case Rep Oncol Med. 2015;2015:512849

29. Pazgan-Simon M, Serafinska S, Janocha-Litwin J. et al. Diagnostic Challenges in Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Case Reports and Review of the Literature. Case Rep Oncol Med. 2015;2015:1-5

30. Challenges in the Management of Advanced HCC [Internet]. OncLive. [cited. 2022 Oct 22]. Available from: https://www.onclive.com/view/challenges-in-the-management-of-advanced-hcc

31. Bakrania A, Zheng G, Bhat M. Nanomedicine in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A New Frontier in Targeted Cancer Treatment. Pharmaceutics. 2021;14:41

32. Alhalmi A, Beg S, Kohli K. et al. Nanotechnology Based Approach for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Targeting. Curr Drug Targets. 2021;22:779-792

33. Rasool M, Malik A, Waquar S. et al. New challenges in the use of nanomedicine in cancer therapy. Bioengineered. 13:759-773.

34. Chavda VP. Chapter 1 - Nanotherapeutics and Nanobiotechnology. In: Mohapatra SS, Ranjan S, Dasgupta N, et al. Appl Target Nano Drugs Deliv Syst [Internet]. Elsevier; 2019 [cited. 2022 Oct 22]. p. 1-13. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128140291000016

35. de Lope CR, Tremosini S, Forner A. et al. Management of HCC. J Hepatol. 2012;56(Suppl 1):S75-87

36. Nanotheranostics. A powerful next-generation solution to tackle hepatocellular carcinoma - PMC [Internet]. [cited. 2022 Sep 16]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8776531/

37. Gavas S, Quazi S, Karpiński TM. Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy: Current Progress and Challenges. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2021;16:173

38. Taghizadeh S, Alimardani V, Roudbali PL. et al. Gold nanoparticles application in liver cancer. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019;25:389-400

39. Karlsson J, Vaughan HJ, Green JJ. Biodegradable Polymeric Nanoparticles for Therapeutic Cancer Treatments. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng. 2018;9:105-127

40. Muddineti OS, Ghosh B, Biswas S. Current trends in using polymer coated gold nanoparticles for cancer therapy. Int J Pharm. 2015;484:252-267

41. Wang M, Thanou M. Targeting nanoparticles to cancer. Pharmacol Res. 2010;62:90-99

42. Malla RR, Kumari S, Kgk D. et al. Nanotheranostics: Their role in hepatocellular carcinoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2020;151:102968

43. Hou X-Y, Jiang G, Yang C-S. et al. Application of Nanotechnology in the Diagnosis and Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Recent Patents Anticancer Drug Discov. 2016;11:322-331

44. Swierczewska M, Liu G, Lee S. et al. High-sensitivity nanosensors for biomarker detection. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:2641-2655

45. Cao L, Zhu Y-Q, Wu Z-X. et al. Engineering nanotheranostic strategies for liver cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021;13:1213-1228

46. Chavda V, Thalkari Y, Marwadi S. New Strategies in Drug Discovery. Comput Bioinforma [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2021 [cited. 2022 Oct 22]. p. 25-48. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119654803.ch2

47. Chavda VP, Patel Z, Parmar Y. et al. In Silico Protein Design and Virtual Screening. Comput Bioinforma [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2021 [cited. 2022 Oct 22]. p. 85-99. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119654803.ch5

48. Chavda V, Sheta S, Changani D. et al. New Bioinformatics Platform-Based Approach for Drug Design. Comput Bioinforma [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2021 [cited. 2022 Oct 22]. p. 101-120. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119654803.ch6

49. Patra JK, Das G, Fraceto LF. et al. Nano based drug delivery systems: recent developments and future prospects. J Nanobiotechnology [Internet]. 2018 [cited. 2022 Sep 18];16:71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-018-0392-8

50. Chavda VP, Jogi G, Paiva-Santos AC. et al. Biodegradable and removable implants for controlled drug delivery and release application. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2022;0:1-5

51. Raza A, Sood GK. Hepatocellular carcinoma review: Current treatment, and evidence-based medicine. World J Gastroenterol WJG. 2014;20:4115-4127

52. Salatin S, Yari Khosroushahi A. Overviews on the cellular uptake mechanism of polysaccharide colloidal nanoparticles. J Cell Mol Med. 2017;21:1668-1686

53. Oh N, Park J-H. Endocytosis and exocytosis of nanoparticles in mammalian cells. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:51-63

54. Olusanya TOB, Haj Ahmad RR, Ibegbu DM. et al. Liposomal Drug Delivery Systems and Anticancer Drugs. Mol J Synth Chem Nat Prod Chem. 2018;23:907

55. Yadav D, Sandeep K, Pandey D. et al. Liposomes for Drug Delivery. J Biotechnol Biomater [Internet]. 2017 [cited. 2022 Sep 18];07. Available from: https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/liposomes-for-drug-delivery-2155-952X276-97370.html

56. Cancer drug delivery in the nano era. An overview and perspectives (Review) [Internet]. [cited 2022 Sep 18]. Available from: https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/or. 2017 5718

57. Desai N. Challenges in Development of Nanoparticle-Based Therapeutics. AAPS J. 2012;14:282-295

58. Gilabert-Oriol R, Ryan GM, Leung AWY. et al. Liposomal Formulations to Modulate the Tumour Microenvironment and Antitumour Immune Response. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:2922

59. H M. Toward a full understanding of the EPR effect in primary and metastatic tumors as well as issues related to its heterogeneity. Adv Drug Deliv Rev [Internet]. 2015 [cited. 2022 Oct 20];91. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25579058/

60. Subhan MA, Yalamarty SSK, Filipczak N. et al. Recent Advances in Tumor Targeting via EPR Effect for Cancer Treatment. J Pers Med. 2021;11:571

61. Wei M, Guo X, Tu L. et al. Lactoferrin-modified PEGylated liposomes loaded with doxorubicin for targeting delivery to hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015;10:5123-5137

62. Singh P, Pandit S, Mokkapati VRSS. et al. Gold Nanoparticles in Diagnostics and Therapeutics for Human Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:1979

63. Choi K, Joo H. Assessment of Gold Nanoparticles-Inhibited Cytochrome P450 3A4 Activity and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Its Cellular Toxicity in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Line C3A. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2018;13:279

64. Bonferoni MC, Gavini E, Rassu G. et al. Chitosan Nanoparticles for Therapy and Theranostics of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Liver-Targeting. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:870

65. Xiang D, Zheng C, Zhou S-F. et al. Superior Performance of Aptamer in Tumor Penetration over Antibody: Implication of Aptamer-Based Theranostics in Solid Tumors. Theranostics. 2015;5:1083-1097

66. Björnmalm M, Thurecht KJ, Michael M. et al. Bridging Bio-Nano Science and Cancer Nanomedicine. ACS Nano. 2017;11:9594-9613

67. Roma-Rodrigues C, Pombo I, Raposo L. et al. Nanotheranostics Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7:197

68. Lee YJ, Lee S-W. Regression of hepatocarcinoma cells using RNA aptamer specific to alpha-fetoprotein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;417:521-527

69. Dong L, Tan Q, Ye W. et al. Screening and Identifying a Novel ssDNA Aptamer against Alpha-fetoprotein Using CE-SELEX. Sci Rep. 2015;5:15552

70. Pilapong C, Sitthichai S, Thongtem S. et al. Smart magnetic nanoparticle-aptamer probe for targeted imaging and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Pharm. 2014;473:469-474

71. Kruh GD, Goldstein LJ. Doxorubicin and multidrug resistance. Curr Opin Oncol. 1993;5:1029-1034

72. Wu J-Y, Wang Z-X, Zhang G. et al. Targeted co-delivery of Beclin 1 siRNA and FTY720 to hepatocellular carcinoma by calcium phosphate nanoparticles for enhanced anticancer efficacy. Int J Nanomedicine. 2018;13:1265-1280

73. Lai Z, Tan J, Wan R. et al. An 'activatable' aptamer-based fluorescence probe for the detection of HepG2 cells. Oncol Rep. 2017;37:2688-2694

74. Hu Z, Tan J, Lai Z. et al. Aptamer Combined with Fluorescent Silica Nanoparticles for Detection of Hepatoma Cells. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2017;12:96

75. Barrangou R, Fremaux C, Deveau H. et al. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science. 2007;315:1709-1712

76. Redd Bowman KE, Lu P, Vander Mause ER. et al. Advances in delivery vectors for gene therapy in liver cancer. Ther Deliv. 2020;11:833-850

77. Ghosh S, Ghosh S, Sil PC. Role of nanostructures in improvising oral medicine. Toxicol Rep. 2019;6:358-368

78. Parodi A, Buzaeva P, Nigovora D. et al. Nanomedicine for increasing the oral bioavailability of cancer treatments. J Nanobiotechnology. 2021;19:354

79. Golla K, Bhaskar C, Ahmed F. et al. A target-specific oral formulation of Doxorubicin-protein nanoparticles: efficacy and safety in hepatocellular cancer. J Cancer. 2013;4:644-652

80. Liapi E, Geschwind J-FH. Intra-arterial therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: where do we stand?. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1234-1246

81. Cancers | Free Full-Text | Intraarterial Therapies for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma [Internet]. [cited 2022 Oct 20]. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/14/3351.

82. Merle P, Camus P, Abergel A. et al. Safety and efficacy of intra-arterial hepatic chemotherapy with doxorubicin-loaded nanoparticles in hepatocellular carcinoma. ESMO Open. 2017;2:e000238

83. Yao Y, Zhou Y, Liu L. et al. Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery in Cancer Therapy and Its Role in Overcoming Drug Resistance. Front Mol Biosci. 2020;7:193

84. Chavda VP. Chapter 4 - Nanobased Nano Drug Delivery: A Comprehensive Review. In: Mohapatra SS, Ranjan S, Dasgupta N, et al. Appl Target Nano Drugs Deliv Syst [Internet]. Elsevier; 2019 [cited. 2022 Oct 22]. p. 69-92. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128140291000041

85. Chavda VP, Vihol D, Mehta B. et al. Phytochemical-loaded liposomes for anticancer therapy: an updated review. Nanomed. 2022;17:547-568

86. Chen R-P, Chavda VP, Patel AB. et al. Phytochemical Delivery Through Transferosome (Phytosome): An Advanced Transdermal Drug Delivery for Complementary Medicines. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:850862

87. Huang Y, Fan C-Q, Dong H. et al. Current applications and future prospects of nanomaterials in tumor therapy. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:1815-1825

88. Baig B, Halim SA, Farrukh A. et al. Current status of nanomaterial-based treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;116:108852

89. Gupta S, Murthy CN, Prabha CR. Recent advances in carbon nanotube based electrochemical biosensors. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;108:687-703

90. Ahmadian E, Janas D, Eftekhari A. et al. Application of carbon nanotubes in sensing/monitoring of pancreas and liver cancer. Chemosphere. 2022;302:134826

91. Ye L, Kollie L, Liu X. et al. Antitumor Activity and Potential Mechanism of Novel Fullerene Derivative Nanoparticles. Molecules. 2021;26:3252

92. Fernandes NB, Shenoy RUK, Kajampady MK. et al. Fullerenes for the treatment of cancer: an emerging tool. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022;29:58607-58627

93. Wang Y, Li J, Li X. et al. Graphene-based nanomaterials for cancer therapy and anti-infections. Bioact Mater. 2022;14:335-349

94. Versatile carbon nanoplatforms for cancer treatment and diagnosis. strategies, applications and future perspectives [Internet]. [cited. 2022 Oct 20]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8899561/

95. García-Pinel B, Porras-Alcalá C, Ortega-Rodríguez A. et al. Lipid-Based Nanoparticles: Application and Recent Advances in Cancer Treatment. Nanomater Basel Switz. 2019;9:E638

96. Li Y, Zhang R, Xu Z. et al. Advances in Nanoliposomes for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Liver Cancer. Int J Nanomedicine. 2022;17:909-925

97. Chavda VP, Dawre S, Pandya A. et al. Lyotropic liquid crystals for parenteral drug delivery. J Controlled Release. 2022;349:533-549

98. Graur F, Puia A, Mois EI. et al. Nanotechnology in the Diagnostic and Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Mater Basel Switz. 2022;15:3893

99. Chavda VP, Sorathiya A, Valu D. et al. Role of Data Mining in Bioinformatics. Comput Bioinforma [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2021 [cited. 2022 Oct 22]. p. 69-84. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119654803.ch4

100. Mitchell MJ, Billingsley MM, Haley RM. et al. Engineering precision nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20:101-124

101. Chavda V, Soniwala M, Chavda J. Archaeosomes: a robust liposome. Int J Pharm Biol Sci Ar. 2013;1:38-45

102. Nsairat H, Khater D, Sayed U. et al. Liposomes: structure, composition, types, and clinical applications. Heliyon. 2022;8:e09394

103. Sharma A, Goyal AK, Rath G. Recent advances in metal nanoparticles in cancer therapy. J Drug Target. 2018;26:617-632

104. Xu J-J, Zhang W-C, Guo Y-W. et al. Metal nanoparticles as a promising technology in targeted cancer treatment. Drug Deliv. 29:664-678.

105. Peng J, Liang X. Progress in research on gold nanoparticles in cancer management. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98:e15311

106. Hu X, Zhang Y, Ding T. et al. Multifunctional Gold Nanoparticles: A Novel Nanomaterial for Various Medical Applications and Biological Activities. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:990

107. Vines JB, Yoon J-H, Ryu N-E. et al. Gold Nanoparticles for Photothermal Cancer Therapy. Front Chem. 2019;7:167

108. Mendes R, Fernandes AR, Baptista PV. Gold Nanoparticle Approach to the Selective Delivery of Gene Silencing in Cancer—The Case for Combined Delivery?. Genes. 2017;8:94

109. Arvizo R, Bhattacharya R, Mukherjee P. Gold nanoparticles: Opportunities and Challenges in Nanomedicine. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2010;7:753-763

110. Foerster F, Galle PR. The Current Landscape of Clinical Trials for Systemic Treatment of HCC. Cancers. 2021;13:1962

111. Garin E, Rolland Y, Laffont S. et al. Clinical impact of 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT-based dosimetry in the radioembolization of liver malignancies with 90Y-loaded microspheres. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:559-575

112. Degrauwe N, Hocquelet A, Digklia A. et al. Theranostics in Interventional Oncology: Versatile Carriers for Diagnosis and Targeted Image-Guided Minimally Invasive Procedures. Front Pharmacol [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2022 Nov 25];10. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar. 2019 00450

113. Guan Y-S, He Q, Wang M-Q. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: history for more than 30 years. ISRN Gastroenterol. 2012;2012:480650

114. Idée J-M, Guiu B. Use of Lipiodol as a drug-delivery system for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: a review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2013;88:530-549

115. Shrimal A, Prasanth M, Kulkarni AV. Interventional Radiological Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Update. Indian J Surg. 2012;74:91-99

116. Lencioni R, Petruzzi P, Crocetti L. Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Interv Radiol. 2013;30:3-11

117. Chang Y, Jeong SW, Young Jang J. et al. Recent Updates of Transarterial Chemoembolilzation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:8165

118. Jl R, A F, L B. et al. Updated use of TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: How and when to use it based on clinical evidence. Cancer Treat Rev [Internet]. 2019 [cited. 2022 Nov 26];72. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30447470/

119. Lencioni R, Cioni D. RFA plus lyso-thermosensitive liposomal doxorubicin: in search of the optimal approach to cure intermediate-size hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatic Oncol [Internet]. 2016 [cited. 2022 Nov 26];3:193-200. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6095431/

120. Regenold M, Bannigan P, Evans JC. et al. Turning down the heat: The case for mild hyperthermia and thermosensitive liposomes. Nanomedicine Nanotechnol Biol Med [Internet]. 2022 [cited. 2022 Nov 25];40:102484. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1549963421001271

121. Rahim MA, Madni A, Tahir N. et al. Mild Hyperthermia Responsive Liposomes for Enhanced In vitro and In vivo Anticancer Efficacy of Doxorubicin against Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Pharmaceutics [Internet]. 2021 [cited. 2022 Nov 26];13:1310. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/13/8/1310

122. Dou Y, Hynynen K, Allen C. To heat or not to heat: Challenges with clinical translation of thermosensitive liposomes. J Controlled Release [Internet]. 2017 [cited. 2022 Nov 25];249:63-73. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168365917300238

123. Badrealam K, Owais M. Nano-Sized Drug Delivery Systems: Development and Implication in Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Dig Dis Basel Switz. 2015;33:675-682

124. Besse HC, Barten-van Rijbroek AD, van der Wurff-Jacobs KMG. et al. Tumor Drug Distribution after Local Drug Delivery by Hyperthermia, In vivo. Cancers [Internet]. 2019 [cited. 2022 Nov 25];11:1512. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/11/10/1512

125. Increased Duration of Heating Boosts Local Drug Deposition during Radiofrequency Ablation in Combination with Thermally Sensitive Liposomes (ThermoDox) in a Porcine Model - PMC [Internet]. [cited 2022 Nov 25]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4592068/.

Author contact

Corresponding author: Vivek P. Chavda, Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, L.M. College of Pharmacy, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad (Gujarat)-380009. Phone: +91 7030919407; E-mail: vivek7chavdacom; ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7701-8597.

Received 2022-10-23
Accepted 2022-11-30
Published 2023-1-9

Citation styles

©2024 Ivyspring International Publisher. Terms of use